Of course, I've made a mistake. There have never been any muzikeion. There was a museion (or Mouseion, or Musaeum). The Temple of the Muses. A place where Muses were worshipped. Well, doesn't matter. I've made a mistake and that's all. Not a big problem, really. Really? Thanks to it there is Muzikeion. A place, a venue, where music is worshipped. Music or muzik? If it is
music then the venue should be known as musiceion. If it is muzikeion then with no doubt muzik is worshipped there. What it is – muzik? Is it a kind of music? A style? A type? A category? Or is it a phenomenon similar to music, as if parallel to music, or sometimes touching it, coming so close to it, as if tangential..... In such a case we would have a new art, and a new Muse as a consequence: painting, literature, dance, music, theatre, muzik.....
What could it be?
 
This is a very cautious question. So I will ask more bravely, even daringly, in a risky way:
WHAT IT IS?

And I will answer this question with the same courage close to frantic desperation:
I DON'T KNOW.

Could it be the music of Liberland? The Liberlandish music?
Maybe.
It may be the noise, the rustle of turning pages, which sometimes takes the form of pulsation that can be felt, though only by a few and really hardly – distances between the turns are a bit shorter, as well as they are more equal, more regular. Such a situation would be rather exceptional, since usually chaos and haphazardness rule, and not necessarily they are chaos and haphazardness of our listening. Nevertheless the rustle of turning pages is not the rustle of leaves shaken by the wind. The noise of a page being turned is like a cut – a page is the blade cutting the space, the rustle is the sound cutting the silence. Both the space and the silence close immediately with no scar. While the rustle of leaves is the silence – used to be silence – can be silence - - - - - - The leaves are the space – used to be the space – can be the space - - - - - - - would seem so - - - - - -
This can be easily imagined: a concert hall is being transformed into a reading room, or a reading room is being changed into a concert hall, and every listener-player (but not a musician – if so, then rather a muzikian), or every reader, is reading a different book, different not only due to the title, but to different shape, size, number of pages, sort of paper .... But this would be too close to music – this would be a conscious action, a sort of composition, and if so, could be also an indication that muzik is to be created as a result of unconscious actions, not planned, not carefully arranged, muzik is not to be a result of any process of composing – it is but very careful listening to the surrounding sounds, hunting and searching for such combinations of sounds which might be compositions if somebody had arranged them deliberately and consciously.
And it's even more easy to imagine books as percussion instruments. Of course those with hard covers, because soft bound books don't sound good, in fact don't sound at all. Well, I don't mean to thrash a table top with a book – I mean to tap the covers with fingers, almost like playing piano . . . . . . . . . But this is real music, whatever strange and unconventional the instrument might seem to you. For example, the suite by Jim Lord, known as the “ocean suite”, a composition for 27 volumes of completed works by Joseph Conrad published in 1975 by . . . . . . yes, it would be a typical, ordinary, as old as music, extreme avant-garde, so extreme that deserving the name arier-garde.
Yes! That's it! Rear guard. ARIER-GARDE!
Muzik or arier-garde music.
Why arier-garde art has never been discussed? What makes it worse than avant-garde? It is equally extreme.
Let's listen ! Let's listen! Let's listen!

nothing can be heard

And now a disgustingly daring question will be asked: WILL THESE SOUNDS BE BEAUTIFUL?
which also means, is supposed to mean, is expected to mean: is the arier-garde art beautiful? does the arier-garde art have to be beautiful or does not?

<<<